RN v USN

January 18th, 2009

US War Plan Red covered possible conflict with Britain (Red and hues
thereof for
other parts of the empire: Scarlet, Ruby, etc). US Army planners argued that
Britain might intervene in a US-Japan (Blue-Orange) conflict because USN plans
to blockade Japan would inevitably cause losses to neutral shipping. The Army
hoped for a 4.6 million-man army to subdue Canada. The USN predicted Canada
would simply declare neutrality. The USN gave it lip service as War Plan
Red-Orange until 1930, then effectively ignored it. War Plan Red was cancelled
in 1939.

For Canada’s current (1998!) preparations to invade the USA, such the build up
of a huge
guerrilla army all along the northern border, see
http://www.neptunenet.com/antican/.

> > I seem to
> >recall reading, years ago, that as late as 1915, both British and American
> >naval dons were still working diligently on war plans aimed at
likelihood of
> >fighting one another!
>
> Uh … this planning was extremely hectic on both sides of the Great Puddle
> in ’19, ’20, and ’21. For a while, it looked like a UK-Japanese-Italian
> alliance would be scarfing it up with a US-French alliance, a development
> subvented by the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922. See the first volume of
> Roskill’s NAVAL POLICY BETWEEN THE WARS for details.

Purpose
The Mahan Naval Discussion List hosted here at NavalStrategy.org is to foster discussion and debate on the relevance of Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan's ideas on the importance of sea power influenced navies around the world.
Links