E-News, Oct. 29, 1997

January 2nd, 2009

From Wed Oct 29 12:46:30 1997
>X-Sender: tcrobi@pophost.fw.hac.com
>Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 14:44:17 -0500
>To: aircraft@idsi.net, mahan@microwrks.com
>From: Tom Robison
>Subject: E-News, Oct. 29, 1997
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
>Following is from an in-house newsletter… not sure of actual sources.
>
>=============
>
> > NAVY ACCELERATES F-14 RETIREMENT — The U.S. Navy has decided to
> > shave three years off the projected service life of its F-14 strike
> > fighters, retiring the last of the planes in 2007.
> > ————
> > GEN. JUMPER REPLACES RYAN AT USAFE — Lt. Gen. John Jumper has been
> > named to replace Gen. Michael Ryan, the new Chief of Staff of the
> > U.S. Air Force, as chief of U.S. Air Forces Europe and NATO’s Air
> > Forces Central Europe, the Pentagon announced. Jumper had been
> > deputy chief of staff for air and space operations. That post will
> > go to Lt. Gen. Patrick K. Gamble, who is the commander of Alaskan
> > Command. Gamble will be replaced by Lt. Gen. David McCloud, now
> > director of the Joint Staff’s force structure, resources and
> > assessment division. Lt. Gen. Frank Campbell, commander of the
> > Twelfth Air Force, will replace McCloud, and Maj. Gen. Lansford E.
> > Trapp, the AF’s director for legislative liaison, will take over
> > command of the Twelfth Air Force. (Aerospace Daily)
> > ————
> > HOUSE PASSES $268B DEFENSE BILL —
> > WASHINGTON — The House Tuesday voted 286-123 to approve a $268
> > billion defense authorization bill despite a White House veto threat
> > and a possible Senate filibuster.
> >
> > The Senate had planned to take up the bill Tuesday, but the prospect
> > of a filibuster caused Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., to put off
> > the measure until today.
> >
> > The Clinton administration and a handful of senators object to a
> > compromise provision that would continue to protect the military bases
> > that employ thousands of workers doing billions of dollars in
> > maintenance and repair jobs on virtually everything the military uses.
> >
> > Lawmakers said they had made major concessions toward the
> > administration’s position — allowing private contractors to compete
> > for more of the maintenance work than is allowed under current law –
> > and most of them want the bill to include a provision upholding the
> > 1995 closure of Kelly Air Force Base in San Antonio and McClellan Air
> > Force Base in Sacramento.
> >
> > As passed by the House, the defense bill rejects the “privitization in
> > place” of Kelly and McClellan that Clinton proposed and says that
> > nonessential defense maintenance work must be opened up to competition
> > from public and private bidders.
> >
> > The senators from Texas and California were promising to use every
> > legislative tactic at their disposal to thwart Senate consideration of
> > the bill.
> >
> > In all, the $268.2 billion bill represents an increase of $2.6 billion
> > over Clinton’s request for the fiscal year that began Oct. 1, and an
> > increase of just over $4 billion compared with last year’s defense
> > spending level.
> >
> > Rep. Floyd Spence, R-S.C., chairman of the House National Security
> > Committee, said the bill represented the best compromise lawmakers
> > could come up with.
> >
> > “The Cold War is over and most people think the threat of war has been
> > removed,” Spence said. “But I’m here to tell you that it’s not a
> > matter of if there’s going to be a war, but where and when.”
> >
> > Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., chairman of the House National Security
> > weapons procurement subcommittee, conceded that the debate was not
> > merely liberal vs. conservative. Hunter said the pressure to balance
> > the budget, a top Republican priority, had forced defense advocates to
> > accept lower levels of Pentagon spending.
> >
> > “We are at what I would call the bottom of a dangerous downswing,”
> > Hunter said. “I think we have been too constrained by the budget. I
> > think we’re going to pay for that in future conflicts.”
> > ————
>
>
>Tom Robison, tcrobi@most.fw.hac.com
>Airborne Communications Systems
>Hughes Defense Communications,
>1010 Production Rd.
>Fort Wayne, IN 46808
>
>Any opinions expressed herein are mine alone, and do not reflect
>the views or opinions of Hughes Defense Communications, Hughes
>Aircraft Corp., Hughes Electronics Corp., General Motors Corp.,
>Raytheon Corp., God, or my wife.

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

Purpose
The Mahan Naval Discussion List hosted here at NavalStrategy.org is to foster discussion and debate on the relevance of Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan's ideas on the importance of sea power influenced navies around the world.
Links