US Army official calls US Marines “extremists” (fwd)

January 2nd, 2009

From Fri Nov 14 00:22:30 1997
>X-Authentication-Warning: ecom7.ecn.bgu.edu: mslrc owned process doing -bs
>Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 01:21:27 -0600 (CST)
>From: “Louis R. Coatney”
>X-Sender: mslrc@ecom7.ecn.bgu.edu
>To: Mahan@microwrks.com
>Subject: Re: US Army official calls US Marines “extremists” (fwd)
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
>
>Some additional thoughts:
>
>1. I believe her remark was no spontaneous “accident,” but a deliberate
> act of provocation and/or intimidation … toward the Marines. If you
> remember, it was the Marines who stood up the strongest and clearest
> against the Administration’s accomodation of homosexuals into the
> service … and …
>
>2. with the campaign corruption … foreign/enemy payoffs … investiga-
> tion beaten, President Clinton now feels free to do what he has
> always wanted to … <50>> investigation gave new credibility to allegations about Ron Brown taking
> commercial bribe money from the North Vietnamese. Brown, of course, is
> buried in Arlington with our other national, historical heroes. He left
> the country in a different way.)
>
>3. I believe BC thinks he can play off the Army against the Marines. We
> will see if Honor is still an Army value. Has the Army succumbed to
> such/lesser temptations in the past?
>
>4. AND this is only going to get worse and worse. Clinton is just the
> (comically) corrupt and clumsy tip of the Vietnam generation iceberg.
> Those students who didn’t serve went on to higher degrees and now hold
> key positions in academia, media, politics, government, ….
>
>5. No matter how anti-military (and anti-Marine) public policy,
> propaganda, and opinion has been in the past, *I* don’t think (the)
> national security (community) has ever been as threatened as it is
> now … and from within … and the academic, media, legal, political,
> etc.) professions have never been so arrogant … and unaccountable.
> Unlike previous generations, the VN generation is a “revolutionary”
> generation that tasted the thrill of the power of the mob … defying/
> mocking/defiling “authority” institutions … and symbols. They think
> they have won … and aren’t at all conscience-stricken about the
> betrayal of the Indochinese (to holocaust) … and our own war dead …
> which that caused.
>
>This iceberg has historical roots … and it is out of control. Only
> reality checks like Saddam Hussein and Kim Il Sung Jr. could give pause,
> but even they will be rationalized … and more will be betrayed …
> given the status quo.
>
>Lou Coatney, mslrc@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

Purpose
The Mahan Naval Discussion List hosted here at NavalStrategy.org is to foster discussion and debate on the relevance of Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan's ideas on the importance of sea power influenced navies around the world.
Links