request for indulgence

January 2nd, 2009

From Tue Nov 11 21:31:14 1997
>X-Errors-To:
>Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 23:30:30 -0500 (EST)
>X-Sender: rickt@pop3.cris.com
>X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
>To: mahan@microworks.net
>From: rickt@cris.com (Eric Bergerud)
>Subject: Re: request for indulgence
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
> >I think this is the kind of thing Mahan is for.
> >
> >By the way, I taped a few weeks ago a C-SPAN show of a lecture by
> >Keegan. he mentioned that his Naval warfare book was not well
> >received, asserting that the Naval Historian writers formed rather
> >a closed club and that if you made a few small errors you were raked
> >over the coals by them.
> >
> >I would assert that if you get details wrong, to what extent can we
> >trust you in the big picture too? At any rate, I would be interested
> >in seeing your comments.
> >
> >Brooks A Rowlett
> >brooksar@indy.net
>
>Frankly I think Keegan has a point. Both naval and aviation history has
>become overly specialized in my humble opinion. Keegan’s _Face of Battle_
>contained a host of assumptions that a military historian could question but
>it was a brilliant book nevertheless. There is a priesthood of military
>minutia in every field and it can have a stifling effect, especially if it
>keeps non-specialists out of things. It also leads people to stress either a
>certain type of technical study (damn, I’d KILL for more good books on basic
>military sub-systems in World War II: bombs, gunsights, self-sealing fuel
>tanks, fire control or damage control on ships etc etc) or first person
>accounts from the “bottom of the fish bowl.” What is getting lost is the
>fabric of operations: the intersection of technology, military doctrine and
>the human psyche. And we should be glad that someone is reaching a large
>audiance in print. I knew the subject a little too well to like the World
>War II sections in _Admiralty_ but sure considered some segments contained
>in the chapters on Trafalgar and Jutland worth the price of admission. I’ve
>done three books and believe me I am convinced that no one is perfect but
>Allah. Mistakes of one kind or another are built into the game. (A good
>editor is worth their weight in gold. In my first Vietnam book I almost had
>Troung Chinh, chief ideological guide of Hanoi’s politburo, commanding the
>ARVN 25th Division. Odd things happen at 3:00 AM). Obviously this is a
>matter of degree. Nobody can support sloppy research. Yet it’s worth it to
>paint with a broad brush sometimes but when you do it’s a lot easier to
>dribble paint on the carpet.
>Eric Bergerud, 531 Kains Ave, Albany CA 94706, 510-525-0930

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

Purpose
The Mahan Naval Discussion List hosted here at NavalStrategy.org is to foster discussion and debate on the relevance of Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan's ideas on the importance of sea power influenced navies around the world.
Links