Gen’l Washington and the five stars.

January 2nd, 2009

From Tue Nov 11 15:48:20 1997
>X-Errors-To:
>Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 17:47:36 -0500 (EST)
>X-Sender: rickt@pop3.cris.com
>X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
>To: mahan@microworks.net
>From: rickt@cris.com (Eric Bergerud)
>Subject: Re: Gen’l Washington and the five stars.
>Precendence: bulk
>Sender: mahan-owner@microworks.net
>Reply-To: mahan@microworks.net
>
>
> >
> >In the Second War, things were regularized a bit. We ended up with
> >’General of the Army’ as MacArthur didn’t want the same grade as Pershing
> >(they had never gotten along) and Marshall didn’t want to be ‘Field Marshal
> >Marshall’. We ended up with ‘Fleet Admiral’ as Ernie King detested the
> >British and so objected to the use of their grade, ‘Admiral of the Fleet’.
> >
> >If something happened to move our first President up on the retired list,
> >I’d not heard about it. I doubt if he did, either.
> >
> >Marc
> >
> >
> >msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315
> >Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!
> >
> >
>Thankee much Marc for the wonderful post. I would guess that if George could
>have observed any of this from wherever “divine providence” originates, he
>would claim complete indifference to sharing rank with other leaders, but
>secretly be ticked as hell. Might be a good thing that MacArthur didn’t get
>into the White House though…he might have tried to get that obelisk renamed.
>Eric Bergerud, 531 Kains Ave, Albany CA 94706, 510-525-0930

Posted via email from mahan’s posterous

Purpose
The Mahan Naval Discussion List hosted here at NavalStrategy.org is to foster discussion and debate on the relevance of Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan's ideas on the importance of sea power influenced navies around the world.
Links